Curiosity at Erasmus MC

From Adaptive Cycle
Revision as of 02:40, 21 June 2012 by Jolanta Wos (Talk | contribs) (Reflectiond regarding Curiosity at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Non-human challenges to curiosity

Guidelines as necessity (balance between practice and creativity)

Protocols vs. flexibility (protocols save time and make your life easier)

Bureaucratic barrier to curiosity (experiments / operations are protocoled)

Organisational and human challenges to curiosity

Cultural inhibitor to curiosity (first name basis / formalities)

Challenging case - Patient (as partner)

Students don’t question decisions / teaching techniques


For further information regarding the Company, the Interviewees, the Interview Structure or Reflections obtained during the process, see Case study Group 2.

For further information regarding the role of Curiosity in the Adaptive Cycle go back to Group 2 Student Lecture.